Subscription is FREE for qualified healthcare professionals in the US.
15 Articles in Volume 16, Issue #6
Osteoarthritis and Central Pain
Uncovering the Sources of Osteoarthritis Pain
The Synergistic Effects of Mood and Sleep on Arthritis Pain
Nonsurgical Rx of OA: Analyzing the Guidelines
Osteoarthritis Disability Is Often Underestimated By Rheumatologists
10 Pain Medication Myths
The Use of Medical Marijuana for Pain in Canada
6 Common Concerns Regarding Medical Marijuana
What Pain Specialists Need to Know About Medicinal Cannabis
Applying Kinesiology as a Multipronged Approach to Pain Management: Part 2
Practical Guide to Adding Recreation Therapy Into Pain Management
A Novel Treatment for Acute Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Genetic Testing in High-Dose Opioid Patients
No More “Fifth Vital Sign”
Letters to the Editor: Disc Herniation, SCS, Arachnoiditis, Tapering Opioids

No More “Fifth Vital Sign”

Is the New AMA Recommendation Helpful?
Page 1 of 2

These days one can hardly open a newspaper or turn on the TV or smart phone without finding yet another story about the opioid epidemic. Government legislatures pass laws funding efforts to address this crisis. Politicians weigh in with their opinions on causes and fixes. And of course the medical community has to weigh in.

The recent American Medical Association (AMA) recommendation, which was announced during its annual meeting in Chicago in June 2016,1 that pain be removed as a “fifth vital sign” in professional medical standards was distressing to me as a pain management physician. It tells us that the AMA has fallen victim to the one-sided approach to solving the drug abuse, addiction, diversion, and overdose death problems by laying the cause at the feet of physicians who prescribe opioids, and therefore concluding that the solution is to dry up the source of legally prescribed drugs.  

The absurd method that the AMA recommends is simply not to ask. The principle behind this is that if we don’t know about a patient’s pain, we don’t have to deal with it! Don’t ask, bury your head in the sand, and pretend it doesn’t exist. The idea is that you will then have to write fewer opioid prescriptions, which will then solve the opioid crisis. The illusion that this announcement by the AMA will be efficacious will succeed only in preventing the AMA from putting additional effort into formulating a more effective plan.

The traditional numeric pain scales: 0, no pain; 10, worse pain experienced.

Fifth Vital Sign—A Reminder to Ask About Pain

What’s wrong with advising removal of pain as the “fifth vital sign”? For one thing, it addresses the wrong setting—pain in the hospital. When it became apparent about 20 years ago that some hospitalized patients were receiving inadequate treatment for their pain, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations established pain as the “fifth vital sign” so that more attention would be paid to inpatients’ need for analgesia. But even now, despite improved treatment of acute pain in inpatients, too often we hear from our patients about inadequate treatment of their chronic pain during hospital or emergency rooms visits for acute problems.  

In the office setting, pain has never been considered an objective “vital sign.” The other vital signs are measureable whereas pain is subjective. We try to pin it down by asking patients to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10. This is indeed useful in that it allows for some comparison of pain levels following the institution of some treatment. In my opinion, the utility of the “fifth vital sign” concept is that it reminds clinicians to pay attention to pain.

Not only is it designed to get them to ask about pain, but it can also produce an increased willingness of health care professionals to listen to what patients say about their pain. After all, pain is the most common reason that patients see their doctor. And in some cases—those patients who don’t volunteer pain complaints, especially older patients—it encourages them to tell us what’s really going on.

The problem with hearing about pain is that dealing with it isn’t fast and easy. Although some clinicians do their best to avoid prescribing opioids altogether, many others do the opposite—any mention of pain results in automatic prescription of opioids. And for patients with chronic pain, mention of increased pain results in an increase in dosing of pain medications. What is forgotten is that pain is a symptom and requires additional information. And this means additional involvement on the part of the clinician.

Only the Start of a Conversation

Hearing about pain constitutes only the “start of a conversation,” as I like to say. It requires a diagnostic evaluation and then determination of optimal treatment approaches. This means not only getting the details of the symptoms, but, importantly, getting to know your patient. Just having a number from 1 to 10 is not enough. What is your patient’s day-to-day life like at present? What activities are they able to perform and what are they unable to do? What type of job do they have? How is their sleep? What physical, psychosocial and/or financial stressors are present in their life? If they are able to walk their dog, how big is the dog and how long do they walk?  

It is crucial to assess function when treating chronic pain. One example is the new patient with 10/10 chronic back pain who is prescribed an opioid. On the next visit he states he is improved to 5/10, and then returns on the subsequent visit and says the pain is now 8/10 so he needs more. Why? Too many prescribers will immediately think “tolerance” or “noncompliance.” Did you?

Most commonly, the explanation is that the decreased pain resulted in increased activity, which then resulted in more pain. The patient’s function has improved. In this case, increasing the dose is appropriate.

As my colleague Bennet Davis, MD, has pointed out, function is the universal measure of outcome success in the treatment of COPD, heart failure, diabetic neuropathy, fatigue, headache, etc. And function needs to be the ultimate measure of success in treating pain.  

At the initial presentation of a chronic pain problem, it’s useful to ask the patient about his or her history and to obtain records of prior evaluation and diagnostic tests, as well as treatments tried. But it’s not enough to simply make a list of what medications or physical therapy (PT) attempts “didn’t work.” Was the medication stopped because of side effects? Or was it simply never increased to effective doses? Was PT “ineffective” because the patient never followed through on home exercises? Such questions need to be asked.

Diagnosis often yields other effective strategies besides opioids. When it comes to chronic pain, patients may benefit from PT and a home exercise regimen, behavioral health assessment and therapy, massage, and alternative approaches. Neuropathic pain may be alleviated with anticonvulsants. Interventionalist pain specialists can provide injections and other interventional strategies. Patients who have difficulty engaging in their treatment, in making lifestyle changes regarding smoking, weight, etc., and in following through with medications and referrals will most likely not benefit from opioids unless and until they participate in behavioral health treatment.

Last updated on: August 5, 2016
Continue Reading:
Letters to the Editor: Disc Herniation, SCS, Arachnoiditis, Tapering Opioids

Join The Conversation

Register or Log-in to Join the Conversation
close X